1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 297 F.Supp.2d
  5. 297 F.Supp.2d 459 (2004)
 

APPLERA CORP. v. MJ RESEARCH INC.

No. 3:98 CV 1201 JBA.

297 F.Supp.2d 459 (2004)

APPLERA CORPORATION and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., plaintiffs, v. MJ RESEARCH INC. and Michael and John Finney, defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 27, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Asim Varma, David Gersch, Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, James Sicilian, Day, Berry & Howard-Htfd-CT, Hartford, CT, Jennifer Gordon, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York, NY, Jennifer K. Lawson, Day, Mario R. Borelli, Berry & Howard, Hartford, CT, Michael J. Klyce, Jr., Arnold & Porter, Washington, DC, Edward R. Reines, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Redwood Shores, CA, John Josef Molenda, Patrick J. Hoeffner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York, NY, Sharon Yang, James T. Shearin, Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, for Plaintiffs.

Albert L. Jacobs, Jr., Gerard F. Diebner, Joseph M. Manak, Greenberg Traurig, New York, NY, C. Allen Foster, Kevin E. Stern Greenberg Traurig, LLP Washington, DC, Daniel A. Ladow, Graham & James, New York, NY, Donna Nelson Heller, Finn, Dixon & Herling, Harold Bolton Finn, III, Patrick J. McHugh, Finn, Dixon & Herling, Stamford, CT, John E. Beerbower, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York, NY, Joseph B. Darby, III, Greenberg & Traurig, Boston, MA, for Defendants.

Daniel A. Ladow, Graham & James, New York, NY, Patrick J. McHugh, Finn, Dixon & Herling, Stamford, CT, for Counter Claimant.

James T. Shearin, Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, for Counter Defendant.

Ruling on Defendants Michael Finney and John Finney's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' Inducement of Infringement Claims [Doc. # 733]

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Defendants Michael and John Finney (the "Finneys") move pursuant Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 for partial summary judgement on plaintiffs' claim that the Finneys have knowingly and actively induced defendant MJ Research Inc.'s ("MJ") inducement of others' infringement of U.S. Patents 4,683,202...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases