IN RE LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SECURITIES LIT.

Nos. 00-CV-621 (JAP), 01-CV-5229 (JAP), 01-CV-3491 (JAP), 02-2460(JAP), 02-CV-4852 (JAP), 02-4260(JAP).

327 F.Supp.2d 426 (2004)

In re LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION, Warren F. Reinhart and Gerald M. Smith, On Behalf of Themselves and A Class of Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al., Defendants. Sandra Balaban, On Behalf of Herself and and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Henry B. Schacht, Richard A. McGinn, Deborah C. Hopkins, Paul A. Allaire, Betsy S. Atkins, Carla A. Hills, Franklin A. Thomas, John A. Young, and Lucent Technologies, Inc., Defendants. Arthur Laufer, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., Henry Schacht and Deborah Hopkins, Defendants. George Pallas, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Henry B. Schacht, Paul A. Allaire, Carla A. Hills, Donald K. Peterson, Franklin A. Thomas, John A. Young, Deborah C. Hopkins and Richard A. McGinn, Defendants, and Lucent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Nominal Defendant. Eva Cooper, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Henry B. Schacht, Paul A. Allaire, Carla A. Hills, Donald K. Peterson, Franklin A. Thomas, John A. Young, Deborah C. Hopkins and Richard A. McGinn, Defendants, and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Nominal Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

July 19, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, Paul C. Saunders, Esq., Daniel Slifkin, Esq., New York City, Lindabury, McCormick & Estabrook, P.A., John H. Schmidt, Jr., Esq., Westfield, NJ, for Defendants Lucent Technologies, Inc., Richard A. McGinn, Donald K. Peterson, and Deborah C. Hopkins.

Milberg, Weiss, Bershad & Schulman LLP, David J. Bershad, Esq., Jerome M. Congress, Esq., Elaine S. Kusel, Esq., Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann LLP, Max W. Berger, Esq., Daniel L. Berger, Esq., Steven B. Singer, Esq., Jeffrey N. Leibell, Esq., Javier Bleichmar, Esq., New York City, Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossmann LLP, Erik Sandstedt, Esq., Westfield, NJ, Co-Lead Counsel for the Plaintiff Class.

Keller Rohrback, L.L.P., Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Esq., Britt Tinglum, Esq., Seattle, WA, Keller Rohrback, L.L.P., Ron Kilgard, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, Berger & Montague, P.C., Todd S. Collins, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, Stull, Stull & Brody, Edwin J. Mills, Esq., New York City, Weber, Gallagher, Simpson, Stapleton, Fire & Newby, LLP, E. Graham Robb, Esq., Cherry Hill, NJ, Co-Lead Counsel for the ERISA Plaintiffs.

O'Melveny & Myers, LLP, Robert N. Eccles, Esq., Gary S. Tell, Esq., Washington, DC, Lead Counsel for the ERISA Defendant.

Kaufman Gelbert & Bern, LLP, Douglas M. Bern, Esq., Fort Lee, NJ, Wechsler Harwood LLP, Robert I. Harwood, Esq., Samuel K. Rosen, Esq., New York City, for Plaintiff.

Squitieri & Fearon, LLP, Olimpio Lee Squitieri, Esq., Newark, NJ, Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP, Jeffrey H. Squire, Esq., Ira M. Press, Esq., Pamela E. Kulsrud, Esq., New York City, Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs.

The Wexler Firm, Kenneth A. Wexler, Esq., Elizabeth Hartweg, Esq., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

Trujillo, Rodriguez & Richards LLC, Lisa J. Rodriguez, Esq., Haddonfield, NJ, Liaison Counsel.

Greenfield & Goodman, LLC, Richard D. Greenfield, Esq., Royal Oak, MD, Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP, Richard S. Schiffrin, Esq., Robert B. Weiser, Esq., Bala Cynwyd, PA, Co-Lead Derivative Counsel.

Donovan Searles, LLC, Michael D. Donovan, Esq., Weinstein, Kitchenoff, Scarlato & Goldman, Ltd., Robert S. Kitchenoff, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, Other Derivative Counsel.

John J. Pentz, Esq., Boston, MA, Counsel for Objector Edward Gordon.

Stephen Tsai, Esq., Edison, NJ, Counsel for Objector Rinis Travel.


AMENDED OPINION1

PISANO, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 I. Introduction .................................................................................. 430

II. Discussion ................................................................................... 430

    A. Discretion and the Percentage-of-Recovery Preference ...................................... 430

    B. The Gunter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases