1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 359 S.C.
  5. 359 S.C. 393 (2004)
 

SMITH v. SMITH

No. 3801.

359 S.C. 393 (2004)

597 S.E.2d 188

Hugh McIntyre SMITH, Respondent, v. Mary Elizabeth Dixon SMITH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided May 24, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carolyn R. Hills, of Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

James B. Richardson, Jr., of Columbia and James R. Honeycutt, of Fort Mill, for Respondent.

HEARN, C.J.:

Mary Elizabeth Dixon Smith ("Wife") filed an order and rule to show cause seeking to hold Hugh McIntyre Smith ("Husband") in contempt for failing to pay alimony. The trial judge declined to hold Husband in contempt, finding Husband did not willfully disobey the court order. We affirm.

FACTS

Husband and Wife divorced on January 19, 1998. Their settlement agreement provided that Wife would receive $3,000 per month in alimony. However,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases