1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 13 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 725 (2004)
 

PRINCE v. CLS TRANSP., INC.

No. B164066.

13 Cal.Rptr.3d 725 (2004)

118 Cal.App.4th 1320

Ronald PRINCE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CLS TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

Review Denied August 11, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of David A. Mallen, David A. Mallen, Los Angeles; Law Offices of David W. Affeld, David W. Affeld, Los Angeles; Pope, Berger & Williams, Harvey C. Berger and Timothy G. Williams, San Diego, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Littler Mendelson, Robert F. Millman, Douglas A. Wickham and Fermin H. Llaguno, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

VOGEL, J.

Ronald Prince, Thomasina Lawrence, and Michael L. Gleaton filed a class action complaint against CLS Transportation, Inc., Charles Horky, and Marcy Horky to recover allegedly unpaid wages.1 CLS demurred on the ground that this is "not an appropriate class action," contending there is no well-defined community of interest, and that a class action is not superior to other methods of adjudicating these particular claims. Over Prince...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases