Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence adduced at the trial was legally insufficient to support her conviction because the testimony of the undercover officer was inconsistent and incredible is unpreserved for appellate review, since she did not specify that ground in her motion to dismiss at the trial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.