1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 3 N.Y.3d
  5. 3 N.Y.3d 729 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. CARRANZA

3 N.Y.3d 729 (2004)

819 N.E.2d 997

786 N.Y.S.2d 381

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANCISCO CARRANZA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 21, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Diamond, New York City, for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney, Goshen (Daniel M. Reback of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant argues that statements he made to a police officer without a lawyer present should have been suppressed, relying on the rule we announced in People v Arthur (22 N.Y.2d 325, 329 [1968]): "[O]nce the police know or have been apprised of the fact that the defendant is represented by counsel or that an attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases