MATAYA v. KINGSTON

No. 02-2850.

371 F.3d 353 (2004)

Randall K. MATAYA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Phillip A. KINGSTON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided June 3, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Palmer, May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, IN, for Petitioner-Appellant.

James M. Freimuth, Office of the Attorney General, Madison, WI, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and POSNER and KANNE, Circuit Judges.


POSNER, Circuit Judge.

After exhausting his state remedies, Wisconsin lifer Randall Mataya sought federal habeas corpus, claiming that he had been convicted in violation of the rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), which requires the prosecution to turn over to the defense evidence in its possession that would be helpful to the defendant, including evidence useful only for impeaching a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases