Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt on the charge of grand larceny in the third degree because the People failed to prove that the value of the stolen vehicle exceeded $3,000 (see Penal Law § 155.35). The contention is without merit because the defendant was not charged with grand larceny regarding the theft of the subject vehicle, but rather, was charged with criminal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
