1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 22 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 675 (2004)
 

COCKSHOTT v. DEPT. FORESTRY & FIRE

No. C045732.

22 Cal.Rptr.3d 675 (2004)

125 Cal.App.4th 235

Perry D. COCKSHOTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

December 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Patrick B. Greenwell and Patrick B. Greenwell, Sonora, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Tom Greene and Mary E. Hackenbracht, Assistant Attorneys General, Christa L. Shaw, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.

SIMS, Acting P.J.

In this case, we hold that the statute of limitations governing the filing of a petition for administrative mandamus challenging a decision of the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection (the Board) is found in Public Resources Code section 4601.3.1

Defendant Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Department) filed an administrative complaint charging plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases