Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction of driving while intoxicated per se as the prosecution failed to establish the element of intoxication. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.