1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 676 N.W.2d
  5. 676 N.W.2d 8 (2004)
 

MAUDSLEY v. PEDERSON

No. A03-915.

676 N.W.2d 8 (2004)

Leslie MAUDSLEY, Appellant, v. Jonathan E. PEDERSON, M.D., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 16, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith L. Emmings, John W. Carey, Sieben, Grose, Von Holtum, & Carey, Ltd., Fairfax, MN, for appellant.

William M. Hart, Cecilie Morris Loidolt, Damon L. Highly, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by ANDERSON, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court's dismissal of her medical-malpractice claim against respondent. Appellant contends that respondent's 15- to 17-hour delay in diagnosing and treating her eye infection caused her to lose vision in one eye. Respondent moved to dismiss the action pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 145.682 (2002), contending that appellant's expert affidavit failed to detail a chain of causation. Appellant contested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases