RACHID v. JACK IN THE BOX, INC.

No. 03-10803.

376 F.3d 305 (2004)

Ahmed P. RACHID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JACK IN THE BOX, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 25, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Durwood Douglas Crawford (argued), Goins, Underkofler, Crawford & Langdon, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lu Pham (argued), Karger, Key, Barnes & Lynn, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.


EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

Ahmed P. Rachid ("Rachid") filed an age discrimination claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, alleging that he was terminated from his managerial position at Jack In The Box, Inc. ("JIB"). Because Rachid established a prima facie case and because issues of material fact concerning JIB's proffered reason for terminating Rachid are disputed, summary judgment was improper and this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases