AUSCAPE INTERNATIONAL, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 12, 2004.
August 12, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Surjit P. Soni, the Soni Law Firm, for Plaintiffs.
Robert G. Sugarman, Pierre M. Davis, Denise Alvarez, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, for Defendants National Geographic Society, National Geographic Holdings, Inc., National Geographic Ventures, National Geographic Interactive, National Geographic Enterprises, Inc., Image Collection and Image Sales, and Mindscape, Inc.
Terrence B. Adamson, National Geographic Society, for Defendants National Geographic Society, National Geographic Holdings, and National Geographic Enterprises, Inc.
Juli Wilson Marshall, Daniel Scott Schecter, Elizabeth Heering Hickey, Latham & Watkins LLP, for Defendants Pro-Quest Company and ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
In Faulkner v. National Geographic Society,1 this Court held that a CD-ROM archive of digitized images of National Geographic Magazine (the "Magazine"), known as The Complete National Geographic ("CNG"), was a "revision" of the print publication within the meaning of Section 201(c) of the Copyright Act of 1976...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
