Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that the sentences are to run concurrently; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly declined to suppress the in-court identification of the defendant by two of the victims. The testimony at an independent source hearing established that the victims had multiple opportunities to observe the defendant at close range for a lengthy period...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.