JACKSON v. GOLDEN EAGLE ARCHERY, INC.

No. 09-96-302 CV.

143 S.W.3d 477 (2004)

Ronald JACKSON, Appellant, v. GOLDEN EAGLE ARCHERY, INC., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Decided August 12, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Cash Smith, Bush, Lewis & Roebuck, PC, George Barron, Orange, David W. Holman & Keeling, PC, Houston, for appellant.

Lipscomb Norvell, Jr., Benckenstien, Norvell & Nathan, LLP, Beaumont, Jacqueline M. Stroh, Crofts & Callaway, PC, San Antonio, for appellee.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and HILL, JJ.


OPINION ON REMAND

DON BURGESS, Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is the third time this case has been before our court. In our first decision, we considered alleged juror misconduct and the constitutionality of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 327(b) and Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b), both of which limit proof of juror misconduct. See Jackson v. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc., 974 S.W.2d 952 (Tex.App.-Beaumont...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases