Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his conviction was not improperly based solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice (see CPL 60.22 [1]). Rather, there was corroborative evidence that the defendant provided the shooter with a disguise and a gun shortly before the shooting, that the defendant was at the scene of the shooting, and that he had a motive to have the victim shot (see People v Breland...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
