Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of bail jumping in the second degree because the proof was inadequate to establish that he was released on bail upon condition that he should subsequently appear personally in connection with the charge against him (see Penal Law § 215.56). This challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.