IN RE NEW ENGLAND MUT. LIFE INS. CO. SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

Model No. MDL-1105(REK), Civ. No. C.A.96-11534-REK.

324 F.Supp.2d 288 (2004)

In re NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

July 6, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Constantine Athanas, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, Michael J. Lacek, New England Financial, Boston, MA, for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant.

Tamara S. Wolfson, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, Peter S. Terris, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for New England Mutual Life Insurance, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendants.

Alan L. Briggs, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Washington, DC, Stephen L. Coco, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Jonathan T. Foot, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, Kenneth W. Salinger, Palmer & Dodge, LLP, Boston, MA, for New England Mutual Life Insurance, Defendant.

Earle F. Kyle, Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen & Holstein, Minneapolis, MN, Robert W. Biederman, Hubbard & Biederman, Dallas, TX, Stephen Hubbard, Hubbard & Biederman, Dallas, TX, Joseph J. DePalma, Goldstein Lite & DePalma, Newark, NJ, Aaron A. Dean, Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen & Holstein, Minneapolis, MN, Richard A. Lockridge, Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen & Holstein, Minneapolis, MN, for Clay M. King, Edwin Suib, Kenneth A. McRaney, Paul A. Wischmeyer, Sarah K. Steiner, Plaintiffs.

Maria Bobonis-Zequeira, Woods & Woods, Hato Rey, PR, Antonio Borres, Woods & Woods, Hato Rey, PR, for Betty Faigenblat, Consolidated Plaintiff.

William Bogot, Krislov & Associates, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Edmund S. Goulder, Harold Siagel, Plaintiffs.

John L. Davidson, Frazer Davidson, Jackson, MS, for Albert J. Singletary, Betty Allen, Betty Iles, Edmund P. Miller, Jr., James R. Allen, Jill Marie Koening, Patricia Ann Lee, Roberta Raworth Scarbrough, Consolidated Plaintiffs.

Thomas R. Frazer, II, Frazer Davidson, PA, Jackson, MS, for Betty Iles, Edmund P. Miller, Jr., James R. Allen, Jill Marie Koening, Patricia Ann Lee, Roberta Raworth Scarbrough, Consolidated Plaintiffs.

Nancy F. Gans, Moulton & Gans, PC, Boston, MA, for Clay M. King, Plaintiff.

Kenneth G. Gilman, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, David Pastor, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, Saugus, MA, for Edwin Suib, Plaintiff.

Brian M. Hurley, Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster, Boston, MA, for Kemper Galleries, Inc., George Edward Kemper, George Emil Kemper, John M. Kemper, Ruby A. Kemper, Plaintiffs.

Warren D. Hutchison, Donovan & Hatem, LLP, Boston, MA, for John Terrill, Movant.

Fred Taylor Isquith, Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz, New York, NY, for Sarah K. Steiner, Plaintiff.

Clinton A. Krislov, Krislov & Associates, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Edmund S. Goulder, Harold Siagel, Plaintiffs.

James P. Langendorf, Froelich & Weprin Co., L.P.A., Dayton, OH, for Magdy Migally, Plaintiff.

Stephen Moulton, Moulton & Gans, PC, Boston, MA, for Clay M. King, Jean C. King, Plaintiffs.

Robert T. Naumes, Thornton & Naumes, LLP, Boston, MA, for Benita Battles, James E. Nabors, Plaintiffs.

Diane A. Nygaard, Nygaard Law Firm, Leawood, KS, for Robert Simpson, Plaintiff.

Richard T. Phillips, Smith, Phillips, Mitchell, Scott & Rutherford, Batesville, MS, for Kenneth A. McRaney, Plaintiff.

Joel P. Suttenberg, Law Office of Joel P. Suttenberg, Boston, MA, for Paul A. Wischmeyer, Plaintiff.

James I. Weprin, Froelich & Weprin Co., L.P.A., Dayton, OH, for Magdy Migally, Plaintiff.

Ronald N. Whitney, Ronald N. Whitney, Whitman, MA, for Kemper Galleries, Inc., George Edward Kemper, George Emil Kemper, John M. Kemper, Ruby A. Kemper, Plaintiffs.

John P. Zavez, Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo, Boston, MA, for Michelle J. Muszynski, Paul J. Muszynski, Consolidated Plaintiffs.


MEMORANDUM IN EXPLANATION and PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ORDER NO. 19

KEETON, Senior District Judge.

Practice and Procedure Order No. 19 supplements earlier Practice and Procedure Orders and does not modify any of them.

Memorandum in Explanation

I. Introduction

In Practice and Procedure Order Number 18 (September 24, 2003), this court concluded that the only tag-along civil actions remaining in this MDL proceeding, MDL-1105 (REK)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases