FRYE v. TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC, INC.

No. A104078.

16 Cal.Rptr.3d 583 (2004)

Steven FRYE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 18, 2004.

Review Granted November 10, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Andrew M. Zacks, Andrew M. Zacks, James B. Kraus, Law Offices of Paul F. Utrecht, Paul F. Utrecht, San Francisco, for Appellant.

Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc., Stephen L. Collier, for Respondent.


KAY, P.J.

Roy Frye (Frye) was a former client of respondent Tenderloin Housing Clinic, Inc. (THC).1 Following a successful challenge against his landlord, Frye filed an action against THC arguing that it was not entitled to the statutory attorney fees awarded by the court because THC was not authorized to practice law and improperly included a contingent fee clause in his retainer agreement. This appeal presents two issues: (1) whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases