IN RE METLIFE DEMUTUALIZATION LITIGATION

No. CV-00-2258.

322 F.Supp.2d 267 (2004)

In re METLIFE DEMUTUALIZATION LITIGATION.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

June 22, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas Kraus, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP., New York City, for Movants.

Jared B. Stamell, Stamell & Schager, L.L.P., New York City, for Plaintiff/Consol Plaintiffs.

Bruce E. Yannett, Carl J. Micarelli, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP., Duncan J. Logan, New York City, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ["MetLife"], moves under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9 and 12 and pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act to dismiss the Second Claim for Relief contained in the Second Amended Complaint of the class action Plaintiffs in this litigation. This claim by former MetLife policyholders is one of securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases