1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 366 F.3d
  5. 366 F.3d 217 (2004)
 

KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW v. 898 BELMONT INC.

No. 02-1770.

366 F.3d 217 (2004)

KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, CORP., LTD., Appellant v. 898 BELMONT, INC., d/b/a El Toro Bar; Berhanu Degife.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed April 27, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francine R. Strauss, (Argued), Potomac, MD, Bradley H. Trushin, Marcus W. Corwin, P.A., Boca Raton, FL, for Appellants.

Donald M. Moser, (Argued), Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.

Before ROTH, BARRY and FUENTES, Circuit Judges.

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Once again, we must determine what statute of limitations to apply when a federal statute does not specify a limitations period. In this case, involving the Federal Communications Act (FCA), KingVision claims that defendants exhibited a closed circuit telecast through the use of an illegal decoding device. The District Court applied the two year limitations period of the Pennsylvania cable piracy statute instead of the three year limitations period...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases