1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 11 A.D.3d
  5. 11 A.D.3d 569 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. THOMAS

11 A.D.3d 569 (2004)

782 N.Y.S.2d 798

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DURAN THOMAS, Also Known as DURAN CLARK, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 12, 2004.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371 [1974]), which permitted the prosecutor to inquire, inter alia, about the defendant's use of two aliases upon his arrest, was not reversible error. There is no per se rule prohibiting the cross-examination of a defendant concerning his or her past use of aliases (...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases