HAMBURG v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. A101829.

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 568 (2004)

116 Cal.App.4th 497

Dan HAMBURG, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

As Modified March 3, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Mark E. Merin, Mark E. Merin, Sacramento, for Appellants.

Phillips, Spallas & Fotouhi, LLP, Robert K. Phillips, Ryan T. Dunn, San Francisco, for Respondents.


KLINE, P.J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellants, who were conducting a protest at respondent Wal-Mart's business premises in Ukiah, were arrested for trespass after they refused to leave. They commenced this action for false arrest and violation of constitutional rights against Wal-Mart and the store manager who made the arrests as a private person. (Pen.Code, § 837.) Respondents moved for summary judgment and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases