Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the Hearing Examiner properly denied her application to direct the father pay a pro rata share of child care expenses, as she failed to prove that she incurred such expenses (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [4]). The Hearing Examiner also properly declined to impute additional income to the father. The findings regarding the father's income were based on credibility determinations...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.