THOMPSON v. CURTIS

No. 05-02-01192-CV.

127 S.W.3d 446 (2004)

Elizabeth THOMPSON, Appellant v. Daniel CURTIS and Dawn Curtis, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

February 27, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Mark Montgomery, Parker & Montgomery, McKinney, for appellant.

Daniel P. Clark, Clark, Browne & Morales, L.C., Dallas, for appellees.

Before Justices MOSELEY, FITZGERALD, and LANG.


OPINION

Opinion by Justice LANG.

A dog owned by Daniel Curtis and Dawn Curtis bit Elizabeth Thompson. She sued the Curtises, alleging strict liability and negligence. The Curtises moved for summary judgment on Thompson's claims, specifically attacking the cause in fact element of proximate and producing causation. The trial court granted summary judgment in the Curtises' favor. In four issues, Thompson contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases