Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in admitting testimony that following a conversation the defendant's sister had with the owners of a local store, the complainant's chain, which had been stolen, appeared in the store. This contention, and the contention that the prosecution improperly commented upon it, is partially unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Rosen,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
