1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 273 Wis.2d
  5. 273 Wis.2d 294 (2004)
 

STATE v. BURRIS

No. 00-1425.

273 Wis.2d 294 (2004)

2004 WI 91

682 N.W.2d 812

IN RE the COMMITMENT OF Ervin BURRIS: STATE of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Ervin BURRIS, Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Joseph L. Sommers, Madison, and oral argument by Joseph L. Sommers.

For the petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general.

¶ 1. DAVID T. PROSSER, J.

This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, State v. Burris, 2002 WI App 262, 258 Wis.2d 454, 654 N.W.2d 866, which affirmed the circuit court's revocation of petitioner's supervised release under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1997-98).1 The principal issue presented is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases