1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 378 F.3d
  5. 378 F.3d 182 (2004)
 

WALLACE v. BUTTAR

Docket No. 03-7158.

378 F.3d 182 (2004)

Michael E. WALLACE, David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti, Petitioners-Appellees, v. Daljit S. BUTTAR and Paramjit Buttar, Respondents-Appellants, Robert Winston, Additional Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: August 5, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Wolf, Gersten, Savage, Kaplowitz, Wolf & Marcus, LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioners-Appellees David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti.

Stuart A. Jackson, Re, Parser & Partners, New York, NY, for Petitioner-Appellee Michael E. Wallace.

David B. Chenkin, Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, New York, NY, Stanley T. Padgett, Morgan, Padgett & Associates, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Respondents-Appellants Daljit S. Buttar and Paramjit Buttar.

Before: JACOBS, POOLER, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

POOLER, Circuit Judge.

This case raises questions regarding the scope of federal court review of a decision issued by an arbitral panel. We resolve the case through the application of the familiar principle that the scope of such review is highly constrained. This is especially true with regard to an arbitral panel's assessment of whether the documentary and testimonial evidence presented to it is sufficient to satisfy a particular legal claim. Federal district judges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases