ODOM v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY


8 A.D.3d 542 (2004)

779 N.Y.S.2d 136

JANIE ODOM, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 21, 2004.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the precalendar order did not contain a 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216. Therefore, the court could not dismiss the action based on neglect to prosecute pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see O'Connell v City Wide Auto Leasing, 6 A.D.3d 682 [2004]; Akpinar v John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 302 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases