1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 129 S.W.3d
  5. 129 S.W.3d 421 (2004)
 

COFFEY v. KNOFT

No. ED 83273.

129 S.W.3d 421 (2004)

James COFFEY and Christianamercy Coffey, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark KNOFT, Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 9, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George J. Miller, The Miller/Salsbury Law Firm, Eureka, MO, for appellants.

William F. James, Wuestling & James, L.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, James Coffey and Christianamercy Coffey, appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases