1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 12 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 533 (2004)
 

VINER v. SWEET

No. B138149.

12 Cal.Rptr.3d 533 (2004)

117 Cal.App.4th 1218

Michael VINER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Charles A. SWEET et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

April 23, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Munger, Tolles & Olson, Dennis C. Brown, Mark B. Helm, Allison B. Stein, Los Angeles, Steven W. Hawkins; Paul J. Watford, Los Angeles; Kester & Isenberg and Charles F. Kester, Woodland Hills, for Defendants and Appellants.

Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro, Patricia L. Glaser, Peter C. Sheridan, Los Angeles, and Mila Livitz for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

PERLUSS, P.J.

In our initial decision in this case (Viner v. Sweet (Sept. 28, 2001, B138149) [superseded by grant of review Dec. 19, 2001 (S101964)] (Viner I)), we held to establish causation in fact the plaintiffs in a transactional legal malpractice action are not required to prove the opposing side in contract negotiations would have given them a better deal than they actually obtained had their attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases