1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 356 F.3d
  5. 356 F.3d 188 (2004)
 

PHANSALKAR v. ANDERSEN, WEINROTH & CO.

Docket No. 02-7928(L).

356 F.3d 188 (2004)

Rohit PHANSALKAR, Plaintiff-Consolidated-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. ANDERSEN, WEINROTH & CO., L.P., G. Chris Andersen and Stephen D. Weinroth Defendants-Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Aw & Col, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: September 16, 2003.

Motion Decided: January 7, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel P. Levitt, Shearman & Sterling, New York, N.Y., for Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Andrew J. Rossman, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, N.Y., for Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

Before: JACOBS, STRAUB, Circuit Judges, and WOOD, Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Andersen, Weinroth & Co., L.P., G. Chris Andersen, Stephen D. Weinroth, and AW & Co., Inc. ("the AW parties") have filed a bill of costs under Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure ("Rule 39"), that includes expenditures associated with creating electronic copies of appellate briefs and appendices. Appellee Rohit Phansalkar ("Phansalkar") objects to this portion of the AW parties' Bill of Costs pursuant to Rule 39(d). In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases