1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 358 S.C.
  5. 358 S.C. 185 (2004)
 

HATFIELD v. VAN EPPS

No. 3755.

358 S.C. 185 (2004)

594 S.E.2d 526

William P. HATFIELD, individually and on behalf of The Hyman Law Firm, Respondent, v. Susan F. VAN EPPS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided March 8, 2004.

Rehearing Denied April 22, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Moss and H. Fred Kuhn, Jr., both of Beaufort, for Appellant.

Kevin M. Barth, of Florence; R. Davis Howser and Andrew E. Haseldon, both of Columbia, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM:

William P. Hatfield, individually, and on behalf of the Hyman Law Firm, brought an action against Susan Van Epps to recover attorney's fees she owed Law Firm. Van Epps filed a counterclaim, asserting legal malpractice. Van Epps appeals the trial judge's decision to grant a directed verdict in Law Firm's favor on a portion of her malpractice cause of action and from the jury verdict, asserting the trial judge made numerous errors. We affirm in part, reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases