1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 8 A.D.3d
  5. 8 A.D.3d 528 (2004)
 

GOLDMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

8 A.D.3d 528 (2004)

778 N.Y.S.2d 719

CAROL GOLDMAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 21, 2004.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

A jury verdict is entitled to great deference and should only be set aside as against the weight of the evidence when it could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746 [1995]; Asaro v Micali, 292 A.D.2d 552, 553 [2002]). Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases