1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 6 A.D.3d
  5. 6 A.D.3d 528 (2004)
 

WIDZISZEWSKI v. KREISLER, BORG, FLORMAN CORP.

6 A.D.3d 528 (2004)

774 N.Y.S.2d 389

HENRYK WIDZISZEWSKI, Appellant, v. KREISLER, BORG, FLORMAN CORP., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 12, 2004.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant demonstrated its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that it did not supervise and control the asbestos abatement work performed by the plaintiff (see Russin v Picciano & Son, 54 N.Y.2d 311 [1981]; Morris v Pepe, 283 A.D.2d 558 [2001]; Mocarska...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases