Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in failing to include Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1180 (a) and (e), and PJI 2:77.1 (2004 Supp) in its jury charge. However, this argument is unpreserved for appellate review since the plaintiffs did not request a charge, nor did they take exception to the charge as delivered (see CPLR 4110-b; Roman v Parkash,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.