IN RE AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION

Nos. MDL 381, 04 CV 400(JBW).

327 F.Supp.2d 198 (2004)

In re AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. The Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dow Chemical Company, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

August 9, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Constantine P. Kokkoris, Esq., New York, NY, Shelby Roden LLC, by Robert B. Roden, Law Offices of Davis & Norris, LLP, by John E. Norris, Birmingham, AL, Moore & Goodman, LLP, by William H. Goodman, Jonathan C. Moore, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs The Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin, et al.

Smoger & Associates, by Gerson Smoger, Oakland, CA, Williams Cuker Berezofsky, by Mark Cuker; Dean Bencivenga, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiffs Joe Isaacson and Phillis Lisa Isaacson.

The Murray Law Firm, by Stephen Murray, Jr., New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs Daniel Raymond Stephenson, et al.

Rivkin Radler LLP, by Steven Brock, James V. Aosia, Uniondale, NY, for Defendant Dow Chemical Company.

Latham & Watkins, by James E. Tyrrell, Newark, NJ, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, by John C. Sabetta; Andrew T. Hahn, Sr., New York, NY, for Defendant Monsanto Company.

Clark, Gagliardi & Miller, by Lawrence T. D'Aloise, White Plains, NY, for Defendants T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition Co.

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, by William A. Krohley; Willam C. Heck, New York, NY, for Defendant Hercules, Inc.

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, by Michael M. Gordon, New York, NY, for Defendant Occidental Chemical Corporation.

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant Hooker Chemical.

Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, by Kathleen A. Mahoney, Brooklyn, NY, for the United States of America.


ORDER

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

It was ordered that, upon the expiration of a six-month discovery period, the parties submit preliminary motions in this case by September 10, 2004. See In re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig., 2004 WL 1196682 (E.D.N.Y. Mar.19, 2004). On August 2, 2004, the court granted a request of the parties to extend the briefing schedule.

The United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York was to be served...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases