Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant was estopped from claiming that certain distributions to the plaintiff were return of principal where the defendant concedely represented to the plaintiff that the distributions were interest income and the plaintiff relied upon such representations (see Bogoni v Friedlander,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.