Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court properly based his pro rata share of child support on the income stated in his 2002 federal income tax return (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [i]). The income lost as a result of his retirement after the commencement of this proceeding, where his claimed medical reason for retiring was uncorroborated, was properly imputed to him (see Matter of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.