POLLARD v. ERICSSON, INC.

Nos. B170006, B170460.

22 Cal.Rptr.3d 496 (2004)

125 Cal.App.4th 214

Dylan POLLARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ERICSSON, INC., Defendant and Respondent. Anna Clausen, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Nokia, Inc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

December 22, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Law Offices of Shawn Khorrami, Shawn Khorrami, Van Nuys, and Matt Bailey, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Call, Jensen & Ferrell, Scott J. Ferrell, Elizabeth K. Penfil and Melinda Evans, Newport Beach, for Defendant and Respondent Ericsson, Inc.

Bird, Marella, Boxer & Wolpert, Terry W. Bird, Thomas R. Freeman and Eric E. Bronson, Los Angeles; Alston & Bird, Peter Kontio, Randall L. Allen and H. Suzanne Smith, for Defendant and Respondent Nokia, Inc.


VOGEL, J.

Subdivision (a)(17) of section 1770 of the Civil Code makes it unlawful to represent that a consumer will receive a rebate "if the earning of the benefit is contingent on an event to occur subsequent to the consummation of the transaction." In Kramer v. Intuit, Inc. (2004) 121 Cal.App.4th 574, 18 Cal.Rptr.3d 412, Division Two of our court held that this statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases