1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 353 F.Supp.2d
  5. 353 F.Supp.2d 135 (2004)
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. v. SURGICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.

No. CIV.A.03-12310-NMG.

353 F.Supp.2d 135 (2004)

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC, Plaintiff, v. SURGICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 28, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufin B. Cordell, Fish & Richardson, Ahmed J. Davis, Fish & Richardson, Washington, DC, Mark J. Hebert, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.

Joseph C. Andras, Myers, Dawes, Andras, & Sherman, LLP, Irvine, CA, Louis M. Ciavarra, Bowditch & Dewey, LLP, Worcester, MA, Monica Grewal, Bowditch & Dewey, LLP, Framingham, MA, Thomas O. Hoover, Bowditch & Dewey, LLP, Framingham, MA, Vic Y. Lin, Myers, Dawes, Andras, & Sherman LLP, Irvine, CA, Kenneth L. Sherman, Myers, Dawes, Andras, & Sherman, LLP, Irvine, CA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, J.

In the present dispute, Plaintiff Smith & Nephew, Inc. ("Smith & Nephew") alleges that Surgical Solutions, Inc. ("Surgical Solutions") infringed its patent on a certain surgical device. Defendant denies the allegations of infringement and, furthermore, contends that Plaintiff's patent is invalid and unenforceable.

I. Factual Background

Smith & Nephew is the owner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases