CITIZENS FOR HATTON CANYON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al. Defendants and Respondents;
Hatton Canyon Coalition et al, Interveners and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 17, 2003.
Review Denied January 28, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Noland, Hamerly, Etienne & Hoss, Michael Masuda, Christine P. Gianascol, Salinas, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Bruce A. Behrens, Sacramento, David Gossage and Antonio R. Anziano, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary E. Hackenbracht, Assistant Attorney General, John Davidson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.
Law Offices of Michael W. Stamp, Michael W. Stamp, Monterey, for the Interveners and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.
RUSHING, P.J.
Assembly Bill No. 434 (2001-2002 Reg. Sess.) (Assembly Bill No. 434)1 directed the California Department of Transportation (DOT) to transfer approximately 130 acres located in the Monterey-Carmel area, known as Hatton Canyon, to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Parks) for use as a state park. (Stats. 2001, ch. 136.) Article XIX, section 9 of the California Constitution2 authorizes the transfer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
