Ordered that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated March 24, 2003, is treated as an application for leave to appeal from so much of the order entered March 24, 2003, as denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to compel Franklin Brosgol to respond to certain inquiries during his examination before trial, and leave to appeal is granted (see Kinkela v Incorporated Vil. of Mineola,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ALCENA v. EMPIRE BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD
13 A.D.3d 472 (2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 91
VALIERE ALCENA, Appellant, v. EMPIRE BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 20, 2004.
December 20, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
