There was no need to resolve issues of fact regarding an alleged oral agreement. Even if the parties had come to such an agreement with respect to the retrospective adjustment, condition number 8 of the policy expressly prohibited oral modifications. (The inadvertent omission of the complete policy jacket from the original moving papers was adequately explained in the reply affidavit submitted by the former casualty coverage director of plaintiff's Claims Department.) Plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
