SCHWARTZ v. NEVATEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.


8 A.D.3d 469 (2004)

778 N.Y.S.2d 308

RIANNA SCHWARTZ et al., Appellants, v. NEVATEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP., Doing Business as PINBALL PALACE, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 14, 2004.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met its burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that it did not own or control the dog that bit the infant plaintiff (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320 [1986]). In opposition, the plaintiffs' submission of inadmissible hearsay was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases