BENDERSON DEV. CO. v. UTICA


5 Misc.3d 467 (2004)

781 N.Y.S.2d 880

In the Matter of BENDERSON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. CITY OF UTICA et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court, Oneida County.

September 7, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP, Albany (John J. Henry of counsel), for plaintiff-petitioner.

Richard E. Kaplan, Utica, for Kessel Brent Corporation and another, defendants-respondents.

Lawrence A. Sardelli, Utica, for Common Council of City of Utica, defendant-respondent.

Linda Sullivan Fatata, Corporation Counsel (Charles N. Brown of counsel), for City of Utica and others, defendants-respondents.


OPINION OF THE COURT

ANTHONY F. SHAHEEN, J.

This verified CPLR article 78 petition and complaint seek to annul and vacate Utica City Code § 2-29-123 (6) (a) (i), which requires a "three-fourths" vote of the Common Council to amend the City of Utica Zoning Ordinance when there is an adverse recommendation to the proposed amendment by the Planning Board, and also to compel the Common Council to enact an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases