TAYLOR v. SAAL


4 A.D.3d 467 (2004)

771 N.Y.S.2d 671

DAWN TAYLOR, Respondent, v. JOEL SAAL et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 17, 2004.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To be relieved of their defaults, the defendants were required to establish both a reasonable excuse for each default and a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eretz Funding v Shalosh Assoc., 266 A.D.2d 184, 185 [1999]). The defendants failed to meet either requirement. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases