STATE v. SHERRY

No. 03-1531-CR.

277 Wis.2d 194 (2004)

2004 WI App 207

690 N.W.2d 435

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Tabitha A. SHERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided October 7, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Craig R. Day of the Law Office of Craig R. Day, Lancaster.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of David J. Becker, assistant attorney general, and Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general.

Before Deininger, P.J., Lundsten and Higginbotham, JJ.


¶ 1. LUNDSTEN, J.

This is a search and seizure case involving a temporary investigative traffic stop and a subsequent warrantless search of the stopped car. The stop and search led to the discovery of marijuana. Tabitha Sherry moved to suppress the marijuana, arguing that both the stop and the search were illegal. After the circuit court declined to suppress the marijuana evidence, Sherry entered a no contest plea...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases