1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 132 S.W.3d
  5. 132 S.W.3d 337 (2004)
 

BLANKENSHIP v. STATE

No. WD 62946.

132 S.W.3d 337 (2004)

Stanley Wayne BLANKENSHIP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 4, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Andrea K. Spillars, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., HOLLIGER and HARDWICK, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Blankenship appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. He contends his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to assert the doctrine of destructive contradictions on direct appeal. Upon review of the review of the record, we find no error in the motion court's determination and affirm the judgment. The parties have been provided with a Memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases