Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.
The record demonstrates that this action was discontinued by order dated March 23, 2001. Since the plaintiff offered no ground to vacate the order of discontinuance, the Supreme Court erred in granting its motion to restore this action to the calendar (see James v Nadal Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.